As a followup to the previous post, on a personal level, I want to say that I think Brice Lord is a good guy and I don't mean to pick on him specifically. The views he has expressed are very common.
Statism, especially in America, is basically a religion into which people are raised. And just as I don't think people are stupid or evil just because they're religious, I don't think that about those who believe in the state or in the exceptionalism of America. But I do think their beliefs are dangerous and can lead to actions that are stupid or evil, and as such I try to challenge bad arguments defending those beliefs.
The most hopeful outcome of such a process is to convince people to give up their religions and evaluate the world around them without the blinders of faith. Perhaps a more realistic hope is that by speaking up we make it easier for others to do the same and to unite, gradually adding cohesiveness and force to a previously-marginalized viewpoint.
Just like when I've spoken out against religion, I suspect a reaction to what I've said here will be that I'm terribly condescending. But all I've done here is say that I disagree with someone (or lots of people). Implicit in disagreement is the thought that the other person is wrong. Disagreements happen all the time without accusations of condescension, so clearly there's more to condescension that simply telling someone they're wrong.
If it is the suggestion that a perspective is based on faith, not reason, that seems condescending, I would argue that if anything that is a nicer way of telling someone they're wrong. Personally, I'd feel better if my failure to understand reality could be attributable to complex effects of the way loved ones have influenced my emotional development and trusted authorities have deceived me. That seems like the nicest possible way to tell someone they're wrong.
I think this feeling that someone is being condescending is an unconscious way of insulating ourselves from challenges to deeply held beliefs, a point I've made before when I talk about "poor form". Rather than confront the ideas, it enables us to simply dismiss the challenger. After all, even if I am being condescending, that doesn't mean I'm wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment