Friday, February 03, 2006

Learn

3 days in AC stacked up like this

$6/12: 2.5 hours, -$515
$10/20: 16 hours, +$220

The $10/20 game wasn't very good. The $6/12 games were better, I just caught a terrible string of strong 2nd best hands while waiting for the $10/20. The $20/40 game looked great but I couldn't bring myself to take a shot on a limited bankroll.

I really need to learn no-limit. There was tons of action in the $2/5 NL games, but I have no experience there, so I helplessly sat in the crappy $10/20 game and longed for better game selection.

In contrast, my Party $5/10 6max results since I got back

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

can you elaborate on what you meant by:

The $10/20 game wasn't very good.
The $6/12 games were better.
The $20/40 game looked great.

I am a fairly experienced player both online/live limit/no limit but the thing I have played the least is live limit above 5-10. (not sure why since online i play above this)

Anyways, lately when I play live it has been NL. So I hoped you could describe your take on the typical player and overall play at these various live levels. This will help me decide if I should bother playing these games or what...