I've taken a break from rejecting his nonsense, and I'm not sure if I'll continue. But for now, Cara raises some questions for 'check my ip' that I'd also be curious to hear a response about. I kind of doubt I'll get one, but might as well ask.
My rephrasing of Cara's questions for 'check my ip':
1. What is your opinion of the large number of evangelical christians in the US who aggressively seek to impose their faith on others, and who would fully embrace the idea that they're defined by their faith?
2. Are these people worse than adspar? If so, how? If not, how?
3. Do you think they're arrogant ("somehow they know better than all the jews, muslims, other christians, hindus, jains, voodoo-ers, etc and find it necessary to tell us all loudly about it.")?
4. Are these people's actions somehow more defensible because they're trying to "save us"? Do you not think that adspar's intentions are more noble ["warning people that they're wasting their time/money/mind and allowing the "freaks" who do bad things to continue do those things (by not allowing an honest analysis/critique of religion)"]?
As my own followup, I'd be curious to hear what he thinks about the millions of more moderate people who don't actively push their views on others, but who also would say that they are "defined by" their religious views. Are they a problem too?
No comments:
Post a Comment